6 Stories to Read Right Now: EPA Waters of the US Round-up

6 Stories to Read Right Now: EPA Waters of the US Round-up

House Reps quiz EPA on 'waters' rule; EPA agrees to comment period extension

In a House subcommittee hearing on Wednesday, most of what legislators had to say about the U.S. EPA's waters of the United States rule wasn't praise – and it wasn't far from what farm groups are saying, either.

The proposed rule, released officially in March, has livestock and general farm groups united under the same goal to see it eliminated.

Ultimately, the proposal would dictate what falls under the definition of waters of the U.S., therefore designating EPA's and Army Corps of Engineers' jurisdiction for enforcement of regulations outlined in the Clean Water Act.

House Reps quiz EPA on 'waters' rule; EPA agrees to comment period extension

If approved as written, ag groups say it would hurt farmers' ability to make management decisions for their own land. Ditches and intermittent streams on private land, for example, could be subject to permit approval before farmers can complete typical farming and ranching tasks.

“EPA is deliberately misleading the regulated community about the impacts on land use," AFBF's Bob Stallman told the House Subcommittee.

For more background on EPA's 'waters' rule and this week's happenings, follow the links below:

1. Water rule comes under fire. Feedstuffs

2. EPA’s water rule takes bipartisan beating. The Hill

3. EPA approves extension of comment period for waters rule. Farm Futures

4. Over-regulated? Don't Blame EPA; Go After The REAL Bad Guys Farm Progress

5. House spending bill targets EPA’s water jurisdiction rule. The Hill

6. Potential impacts of proposed changes to the Clean Water Act (video) Transport Committe

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish