Farm Bureau asks for Supreme Court review of Chesapeake Bay suit

Farm Bureau asks for Supreme Court review of Chesapeake Bay suit

Farm Bureau asks U.S. Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling regarding Chesapeake Bay pollution management

The American Farm Bureau Federation and a coalition of agricultural and builder groups on Friday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling regarding EPA's pollution limits.

Related: Farm Bureau will take Chesapeake Bay water quality fight to Supreme Court

The lawsuit arose in the context of EPA's "blueprint" for restoring the Chesapeake Bay. The Blueprint requires that the six Bay states and the District of Columbia follow specific plans to meet EPA-enforced nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment pollution limits.

Farm Bureau's concern about the blueprint lies with land use, and the group says it's a national issue.

Farm Bureau asks U.S. Supreme Court to review a lower court ruling regarding Chesapeake Bay pollution management

"[The lawsuit is] about whether EPA has the power to override local decisions on what land can be farmed, where homes can be built, and where schools, hospitals, roads and communities can be developed," said AFBF President Bob Stallman. "This is nothing less than federal super-zoning authority. As much as we all support the goal of achieving a healthy Chesapeake Bay, we have to fight this particular process for getting there."

Twenty-one states, 39 members of Congress and a group of counties within the Bay watershed supported AFBF's legal challenge in the lower courts.

"We certainly hope for even more support in asking for Supreme Court review," said AFBF General Counsel Ellen Steen. "There has been a lot of attention to EPA's recent rule expanding its jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. EPA's overreach in the Bay 'blueprint' is just as aggressive, and its impact on communities and businesses is just as dramatic. From the beginning, this was designed as a model that would be followed around the country."

According to today's court filing, the greatest practical, local harm of the Bay blueprint is that it "locks in" decisions made in 2010 and "deprives state and local governments of the ability to adapt their plans to take account of changes in societal needs, developing technologies, or new information. It prevents them from exercising their own judgment about the best and most efficient ways to achieve the goals for the Bay."

Farm Bureau estimates implementation of the blueprint will cost roughly $28 billion to $30 billion in Maryland and Virginia alone.


More on the Chesapeake Bay clean-up story:
Chesapeake Bay regs would 'flood' Midwest farms
Chesapeake Bay water clean-up model: What Midwest farmers learned.
Chesapeake model: Who'll pay for Mississippi River's clean-up?


TAGS: Regulatory
Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish