How Corn Responds To Crop Rotation

How Corn Responds To Crop Rotation

Study shows corn responses to crop rotation and reduced nitrogen environments. Growers with continuous corn vs. corn in rotation likely face higher nitrogen stress, more yield impairment.

Corn grown in rotation with soybeans requires less nitrogen fertilizer than continuous corn, while producing higher average yields per acre, according to a new study by Pioneer Hi-Bred. It shows that growers with continuous corn versus corn grown in rotation are likely to face higher nitrogen stress and more yield impairment.

"Our research shows that corn residue acts like a 'sponge' immobilizing the fertilizer, making it temporarily unavailable to the corn plant," says John Shanahan, Pioneer agronomy research manager. "Growers who are working with continuous corn need to be mindful of crop residue from the previous year, and adjust (and likely increase) their nitrogen fertilizer rates accordingly."

These findings are part of a long-term, multi-location study by Pioneer that began in 2006 to examine the response of corn in limited nitrogen environments. Evaluations have been conducted yearly at Pioneer research stations in Johnston, Iowa; Champaign, Ill.; Windfall, Ind.; and York, Neb. (Note: The 2011 results were from only the Iowa, Illinois and Nebraska locations.)

This long-term study looks at corn hybrid performance in N-deficit situations

"While many studies have tested corn response to nitrogen fertilizer, there has been limited information on corn hybrid performance in nitrogen-deficient environments," Shanahan says. 

The nitrogen treatments in the study were standardized to five rates as a percentage of university economic optimum recommendations (from 0 to 130%), applied to corn in continuous production as well as corn in rotation with soybeans, and positioned on the same plots from year to year.

"As expected, corn yield increased with increasing nitrogen rates in both continuous corn and rotated corn and decreased with reduced rates of N," Shanahan says. "But what's interesting is that across all tested nitrogen rates, the average yield was higher for corn in rotation versus continuous corn by 33% or about 45 bushels per acre."

Furthermore, reducing nitrogen rates resulted in much more substantial yield decreases for continuous corn than for rotated corn. For example, rotated corn with no applied nitrogen yielded more than continuous corn with 50% of the normal nitrogen rate applied. In addition, reducing rates caused nitrogen stress sooner and with more yield impairment for continuous versus rotated corn.

Similar results have been observed by several university researchers and generally can be attributed to the higher residue levels for continuous corn, leading to Pioneer's recommendation that growers pay key attention to crop residue and fertilizer rates.

Looking at response of specific hybrids to nitrogen rates and crop rotations

To provide further assistance to growers in the future, Pioneer is starting to look into the response of specific hybrids to nitrogen rates and crop rotations. This will be part of the ongoing study as researchers evaluate nitrogen use efficiency among different corn genetics.

"There is a lot of value in analyzing corn responses to crop rotation and reduced nitrogen environments," Shanahan says. "Our goal is to help growers make the best decisions, from hybrid selection to crop management, for their fields."

For more information about corn hybrids, visit  or contact your local Pioneer sales professional.
TAGS: Soybean
Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.