Iowa Farm Bureau Files Lawsuit Challenging EPC Ruling

Iowa Farm Bureau Files Lawsuit Challenging EPC Ruling

President of Iowa's largest farm organization says the lawsuit filed last week against the Iowa Environmental Protection Commission seeks fairness and proper representation on the state panel.

On October 4, 2010 the Iowa Farm Bureau Federation joined with the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association to file a lawsuit challenging a rule adopted by the Iowa Environmental Protection Commission over inappropriate voting by an out-of-state member of the commission and the conflict of interest by another EPC member.

Iowa's grassroots farmers work hard to protect the soil and water of this state which, for generations, have provided food for their families and yours, says Craig Lang, Iowa Farm Bureau president and a dairy farmer from Poweshiek County. That is why IFBF has joined with the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association and the Iowa Water Environment Association to file the litigation.

The lawsuit raises questions about the legality of the EPC vote last December which approved a new water quality rule. "The livelihoods of farmers, rural businesses and all Iowans are adversely affected by the new anti-degradation rules," says Lang. "The rule will stifle new economic development and job creation, especially in rural areas of Iowa."

New anti-degradation rule is threatening to Iowa in several ways

"We know that the anti-degradation rule will likely increase sewer and storm water rates for many Iowans, whether they live in small, rural towns or large Iowa cities," said Ted Payseur, government relations chair of the Iowa Water Environment Association.

The IRFA agrees; "While Iowa is the nation's leader in renewable fuels production, this new EPC rule threatens the future of that status," says IRFA executive director Monte Shaw. "Imposing excessive costs and limitations that go above and beyond the federal Clean Water Act will severely hamper the ability of current biofuels producers to expand and will discourage new producers from locating in Iowa."

Suit says two EPC members shouldn't have been allowed to vote

The lawsuit contends two EPC members had significant issues that should have prevented them from voting on the anti-degradation rule. Residency was the issue for regulator Carrie LaSeur, founder and president of the environmental activist group, Plains Justice. LaSeur was already living and voting in Montana when she cast her vote on the Iowa anti-degradation rule. That is a clear violation of the residency laws governing the EPC, which require members to be registered Iowa voters, says Lang.

Susan Heathcote is an employee of The Iowa Environmental Council, an environmental lobbying group which pushed EPC adoption of the anti-degradation rule. The lawsuit contends she had a clear conflict voting on a measure that affects her employer and her paycheck.

The lawsuit also spotlights procedural irregularities with the adoption of the anti-degradation rule. "Iowans need to believe they are represented by lawmakers who have the public's best interests in mind; not appointed members of a board, serving their own agendas," says Lang.

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish